48 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Design of the Site and Project
|
|
|
|
e.g. information architecture, job stories etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Launchable and *announceable* website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Wireframes and Mockups
|
|
|
|
### Home page
|
|
|
|
Mockup of home page (design): https://excalidraw.com/#room=8bc8a0afb0afc89015dc,W3jd48r8_B2llA2CZ8A33A
|
|
|
|
v0.1 Wireframe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Content Plan (and Info Architecture)
|
|
|
|
Excalidraw: https://excalidraw.com/#room=77b4b0841586502dc440,OS7tGXbkYEf_W5Lgu8PflA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Guide `/guide/`:
|
|
* Claims or Theses `/claims/`: TODO better name for this
|
|
* Notes `/notes/`
|
|
* Concepts `/concepts/`: set of key concepts
|
|
* Library `/library`:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently have `ideologies` folder too. I wonder if we merge into notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Issue Tree
|
|
|
|
* [x] How rough and ready are we in process and hence appearance? **✅2022-03-11 publish early, publish often and accept being "rougher" though flagging what is polished and not. - see [how-rough-and-ready](how-rough-and-ready.md)**
|
|
* [ ] Do we need to distinguish claims from aspirations from debates from questions people have?
|
|
* [ ] Are questions vs hypotheses a better way to frame (or even more attractive on the internet)
|
|
* Questions seem less polarizing: Crypto will transform the world ... vs Can Crypto transform the world?
|
|
* In a proper thesis setup where everyone understands we are dealing in claims and examining them and brings a rigorous open-mindedness then theses are better because can be evaluated ...
|
|
* But we can always turn a claim into a question and vice-versa ...
|
|
* Hypotheses are more accurate than claims but a bit more obscure in terminology
|
|
* H: (70%) use questions rather than claims/hypotheses
|
|
* Do we call ourselves "Making sense of Web3" or "Making sense of Crypto and Web3" or "Making Sense of Crypto"
|
|
* Do we mention Crypto at all? ✅ **Yes, crypto is more widespread and even less controversial in definition so definitely want to mention it** |