web3/meta/design.md

Design of the Site and Project

e.g. information architecture, job stories etc.

Launchable and announceable website.

Wireframes and Mockups

Home page

Mockup of home page (design): https://excalidraw.com/#room=8bc8a0afb0afc89015dc,W3jd48r8_B2llA2CZ8A33A

v0.1 Wireframe

Content Plan (and Info Architecture)

Excalidraw: https://excalidraw.com/#room=77b4b0841586502dc440,OS7tGXbkYEf_W5Lgu8PflA

• Guide /guide/:
• Claims or Theses /claims/: TODO better name for this
• Notes /notes/
• Concepts /concepts/: set of key concepts
• Library /library:

Currently have ideologies folder too. I wonder if we merge into notes.

Issue Tree

• How rough and ready are we in process and hence appearance? ✅2022-03-11 publish early, publish often and accept being "rougher" though flagging what is polished and not. - see how-rough-and-ready
• Do we need to distinguish claims from aspirations from debates from questions people have?
• Are questions vs hypotheses a better way to frame (or even more attractive on the internet)
  • Questions seem less polarizing: Crypto will transform the world ... vs Can Crypto transform the world?
    • In a proper thesis setup where everyone understands we are dealing in claims and examining them and brings a rigorous open-mindedness then theses are better because can be evaluated ...
    • But we can always turn a claim into a question and vice-versa ...
    • Hypotheses are more accurate than claims but a bit more obscure in terminology
  • H: (70%) use questions rather than claims/hypotheses
• Do we call ourselves "Making sense of Web3" or "Making sense of Crypto and Web3" or "Making Sense of Crypto"
  • Do we mention Crypto at all? ✅ Yes, crypto is more widespread and even less controversial in definition so definitely want to mention it