Delete is web3 green

This commit is contained in:
EilidhRoss1 2022-07-21 17:28:42 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent cf12dd1c3e
commit ce7965ad5e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 0 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
# Is Web3 green?
Web3 is allegedly based on crypto assets which have a known [environmental footprint](is-environmental-footprint.md) problem. Therefore web3 is not green.
See also [ESG investing and crypto](is-bitcoin-esg.md), [is-environmental-footprint](is-environmental-footprint.md) and [mining](../concepts/mining.md).
## References
1. Wanat, Emanuel. 2021. Are Crypto-Assets Green Enough? An Analysis of Draft EU Regulation on Markets in Crypto Assets from the Perspective of the European Green Deal. Osteuropa Recht 67 (2): 23750. https://doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2021-2-237.
1. Dindar, B., and Ö. Gül. The Detection of Illicit Cryptocurrency Mining Farms with Innovative Approaches for the Prevention of Electricity Theft. Energy & Environment, no. April (2021): 0958305X211045066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x211045066.
1. Vries, Alex De. Bitcoins Energy Consumption Is Underestimated: A Market Dynamics Approach. Energy Research & Social Science 70, no. July (2020): 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101721.
1. Vries, Alex de. Bitcoins Growing Energy Problem. Joule 2, no. 5 (2018): 8015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.016.
1. Vries, Alex de, and Christian Stoll. Bitcoins Growing e-Waste Problem. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 175, no. September (2021): 105901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105901.