From ce7965ad5e057ec05399f37225baca20c201859e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: EilidhRoss1 <98904290+EilidhRoss1@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:28:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Delete is web3 green

---
 claims/is-web3-green.md | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 claims/is-web3-green.md

diff --git a/claims/is-web3-green.md b/claims/is-web3-green.md
deleted file mode 100644
index b0b8ede..0000000
--- a/claims/is-web3-green.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-# Is Web3 green?
-Web3 is allegedly based on crypto assets which have a known [environmental footprint](is-environmental-footprint.md) problem. Therefore web3 is not green.
-
-See also [ESG investing and crypto](is-bitcoin-esg.md), [is-environmental-footprint](is-environmental-footprint.md) and [mining](../concepts/mining.md).
-
-## References
-1. Wanat, Emanuel. 2021. ‘Are Crypto-Assets Green Enough? – An Analysis of Draft EU Regulation on Markets in Crypto Assets from the Perspective of the European Green Deal’. Osteuropa Recht 67 (2): 237–50. https://doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2021-2-237.
-1. Dindar, B., and Ö. Gül. ‘The Detection of Illicit Cryptocurrency Mining Farms with Innovative Approaches for the Prevention of Electricity Theft’. Energy & Environment, no. April (2021): 0958305X211045066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x211045066.
-1. Vries, Alex De. ‘Bitcoin’s Energy Consumption Is Underestimated : A Market Dynamics Approach’. Energy Research & Social Science 70, no. July (2020): 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101721.
-1. Vries, Alex de. ‘Bitcoin’s Growing Energy Problem’. Joule 2, no. 5 (2018): 801–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.016.
-1. Vries, Alex de, and Christian Stoll. ‘Bitcoin’s Growing e-Waste Problem’. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 175, no. September (2021): 105901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105901.
\ No newline at end of file