jeffemmett
/
infinite-agents-public
mirror of https://github.com/Jeff-Emmett/infinite-agents-public.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
infinite-agents-public/infinite_variants/infinite_variant_2/.claude/commands/report.md

14 KiB
Raw Blame History

Report - Quality and Progress Report Generation Utility

You are the reporting utility for the Infinite Agentic Loop ecosystem. Your purpose is to generate comprehensive quality and progress reports for generated iterations.

Chain-of-Thought Report Generation Process

Let's think through report generation step by step:

Step 1: Define Report Scope

Understand what report is needed:

  1. Report Purpose

    • Executive summary for stakeholders?
    • Detailed analysis for developers?
    • Quality assessment for validation?
    • Historical comparison for trends?

  2. Report Audience

    • Technical users who want details?
    • Non-technical users who need summaries?
    • Decision-makers who need recommendations?
    • Archival documentation?

  3. Time Period

    • Single generation session?
    • Multiple sessions over time?
    • Since last report?
    • All-time comprehensive?

Step 2: Data Collection

Systematically gather report data:

Generation Data:

  1. Iteration Inventory

    • Use Glob to find all output files
    • Count total iterations
    • Identify file types
    • Note creation dates

  2. Specification Reference

    • Read spec file
    • Extract requirements
    • Identify quality criteria
    • Note uniqueness constraints

Quality Data: 3. Test Results (if available)

  • Run /test-output if not already done
  • Collect pass/fail statistics
  • Gather quality scores
  • Note common issues
  1. Pattern Analysis
    • Run /analyze if not already done
    • Collect theme diversity data
    • Identify pattern distributions
    • Note structural consistency

Performance Data: 5. Execution Metrics

  • File creation timestamps
  • Generation duration
  • Wave information
  • Resource usage

Step 3: Quantitative Analysis

Calculate key metrics:

Completion Metrics:

  • Total iterations generated
  • Iterations per specification
  • Generation success rate = successful / attempted
  • Average generation time per iteration

Quality Metrics:

  • Test pass rate = passed / total
  • Average quality score = sum(scores) / count
  • Quality standard deviation = spread of scores
  • Excellent iteration count (score >= 90)

Diversity Metrics:

  • Unique themes count
  • Theme distribution evenness
  • Variation coefficient
  • Duplication rate = duplicates / total

Efficiency Metrics:

  • Iterations per hour
  • Average file size
  • Storage efficiency
  • Context utilization

Trend Metrics:

  • Quality trend = (recent_avg - early_avg) / early_avg
  • Speed trend = (recent_speed - early_speed) / early_speed
  • Success rate trend over time

Step 4: Qualitative Analysis

Assess non-numeric qualities:

Content Quality:

  1. Creativity Assessment

    • How innovative are iterations?
    • Do they show progression?
    • Is there creative diversity?
    • Any standout examples?

  2. Technical Quality

    • Code correctness
    • Structure adherence
    • Best practices followed
    • Professional polish

  3. Usability Quality

    • User-facing clarity
    • Documentation completeness
    • Ease of understanding
    • Practical applicability

Pattern Quality: 4. Theme Coherence

  • Are themes well-executed?
  • Is variation meaningful?
  • Are there theme gaps?
  • Is progression logical?
  1. Structural Consistency
    • Do iterations follow patterns?
    • Are standards maintained?
    • Is quality consistent?
    • Any structural drift?

Step 5: Comparative Analysis

Contextualize performance:

Specification Compliance:

  • How well do outputs match spec requirements?
  • Which requirements fully met?
  • Which requirements partially met?
  • Which requirements missed?

Historical Comparison:

  • How does this compare to previous runs?
  • Is quality improving over time?
  • Are there regression patterns?
  • What's the trajectory?

Best Practice Alignment:

  • Industry standards met?
  • Quality benchmarks achieved?
  • Best practices followed?
  • Professional grade attained?

Step 6: Issue Identification

Categorize problems and concerns:

Quality Issues:

  1. Critical Issues - Block usage

    • Spec violations
    • Technical errors
    • Incomplete outputs

  2. Moderate Issues - Degrade quality

    • Inconsistencies
    • Minor spec deviations
    • Quality variations

  3. Minor Issues - Polish opportunities

    • Style inconsistencies
    • Documentation gaps
    • Enhancement opportunities

Pattern Issues: 4. Diversity Issues

  • Theme exhaustion
  • Unintended duplication
  • Narrow variation range
  1. Consistency Issues
    • Structural variations
    • Quality fluctuations
    • Standard deviations

Step 7: Insight Generation

Synthesize findings into actionable insights:

Success Factors:

  • What contributed to high-quality iterations?
  • What patterns worked well?
  • What approaches should continue?

Improvement Opportunities:

  • Where is quality lacking?
  • What patterns need work?
  • What could be enhanced?

Recommendations:

  • Specific actions to improve quality
  • Spec refinements to consider
  • Process improvements to implement

Step 8: Report Formatting

Structure information for clarity:

  1. Executive Summary - Key findings at-a-glance
  2. Quantitative Analysis - Metrics and statistics
  3. Qualitative Assessment - Content and pattern quality
  4. Comparative Analysis - Context and benchmarks
  5. Issues and Risks - Problems identified
  6. Insights and Recommendations - Actionable guidance
  7. Appendices - Supporting details

Command Format

/report [output_dir] [spec_file] [options]

Arguments:

  • output_dir: Directory containing outputs to report on
  • spec_file: Specification file used for generation
  • options: (optional) Report type: summary, detailed, executive, technical

Report Structure

# Generation Report: [Output Directory]

**Report Date:** [timestamp]
**Report Type:** [Summary / Detailed / Executive / Technical]
**Generation Specification:** [spec file name]

---

## Executive Summary

### Key Findings
1. **[Finding 1]** - [brief description]
2. **[Finding 2]** - [brief description]
3. **[Finding 3]** - [brief description]

### Overall Assessment
- **Quality Rating:** [Excellent / Good / Acceptable / Needs Improvement]
- **Spec Compliance:** [Fully Compliant / Mostly Compliant / Partial / Non-Compliant]
- **Recommendation:** [Approve / Conditional / Revise / Reject]

### Critical Statistics
- Total Iterations: X
- Pass Rate: Y%
- Average Quality: Z/100
- Generation Period: [date range]

---

## Quantitative Analysis

### Completion Metrics
| Metric | Value | Target | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Total Iterations | X | Y | ✓/✗ |
| Success Rate | X% | Y% | ✓/✗ |
| Avg Time/Iteration | X min | Y min | ✓/✗ |

### Quality Metrics
| Metric | Value | Benchmark | Assessment |
|--------|-------|-----------|------------|
| Test Pass Rate | X% | 90% | [Good/Fair/Poor] |
| Avg Quality Score | X/100 | 80/100 | [Good/Fair/Poor] |
| Excellent Count | X | Y | [Good/Fair/Poor] |
| Quality Std Dev | X | <10 | [Good/Fair/Poor] |

### Diversity Metrics
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|--------|-------|------------|
| Unique Themes | X | [High/Medium/Low] |
| Theme Distribution | [Evenness score] | [Even/Skewed] |
| Duplication Rate | X% | [Low/Medium/High] |

### Efficiency Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Iterations/Hour | X |
| Avg File Size | Y KB |
| Total Storage | Z MB |
| Context Utilization | A% |

### Trend Analysis
| Metric | Trend | Change |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Quality | ↗/→/↘ | +X% |
| Speed | ↗/→/↘ | +Y% |
| Success Rate | ↗/→/↘ | +Z% |

---

## Qualitative Assessment

### Content Quality

#### Creativity
**Rating:** [Excellent / Good / Acceptable / Lacking]

**Observations:**
- [Observation 1]
- [Observation 2]
- [Observation 3]

**Standout Examples:**
- [filename] - [what makes it excellent]
- [filename] - [what makes it excellent]

#### Technical Quality
**Rating:** [Excellent / Good / Acceptable / Lacking]

**Strengths:**
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]

**Weaknesses:**
- [Weakness 1]
- [Weakness 2]

#### Usability Quality
**Rating:** [Excellent / Good / Acceptable / Lacking]

**User-Facing Strengths:**
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]

**User-Facing Concerns:**
- [Concern 1]
- [Concern 2]

### Pattern Quality

#### Theme Coherence
**Assessment:** [Strong / Moderate / Weak]

**Themes Explored:**
1. [Theme 1] - X iterations - [well-executed / needs work]
2. [Theme 2] - Y iterations - [well-executed / needs work]
3. [Theme 3] - Z iterations - [well-executed / needs work]

**Theme Gaps:**
- [Gap 1] - [opportunity description]
- [Gap 2] - [opportunity description]

#### Structural Consistency
**Assessment:** [Highly Consistent / Mostly Consistent / Inconsistent]

**Consistency Strengths:**
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]

**Consistency Issues:**
- [Issue 1] - affects X iterations
- [Issue 2] - affects Y iterations

---

## Comparative Analysis

### Specification Compliance

#### Fully Met Requirements
- [Requirement 1] - [evidence]
- [Requirement 2] - [evidence]

#### Partially Met Requirements
- [Requirement 1] - [gap description]
- [Requirement 2] - [gap description]

#### Unmet Requirements
[None] OR:
- [Requirement 1] - [why not met]

**Overall Compliance Score:** X/100

### Historical Comparison

#### Previous Generation Comparison
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change |
|--------|---------|----------|--------|
| Total Iterations | X | Y | +Z |
| Avg Quality | A | B | +C |
| Pass Rate | D% | E% | +F% |

**Trends:**
- Quality is [improving/stable/declining]
- Efficiency is [improving/stable/declining]
- Consistency is [improving/stable/declining]

### Benchmark Comparison

#### Industry Benchmarks
| Standard | Target | Achieved | Status |
|----------|--------|----------|--------|
| Quality Floor | 70/100 | X/100 | ✓/✗ |
| Pass Rate | 85% | Y% | ✓/✗ |
| Diversity Index | 0.7 | Z | ✓/✗ |

---

## Issues and Risks

### Critical Issues (Require Immediate Action)
[None Identified] OR:
1. **[Issue Title]**
   - **Severity:** Critical
   - **Affected:** [scope]
   - **Impact:** [consequences]
   - **Root Cause:** [analysis]
   - **Remediation:** [specific steps]
   - **Priority:** High

### Moderate Issues (Address Soon)
[None Identified] OR:
1. **[Issue Title]**
   - **Severity:** Moderate
   - **Affected:** [scope]
   - **Impact:** [consequences]
   - **Recommendation:** [suggested fix]
   - **Priority:** Medium

### Minor Issues (Enhancement Opportunities)
1. **[Issue Title]**
   - **Severity:** Minor
   - **Opportunity:** [description]
   - **Benefit:** [if addressed]
   - **Priority:** Low

### Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [strategy] |
| [Risk 2] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [strategy] |

---

## Insights and Recommendations

### Key Insights

#### Success Factors
1. **[Factor 1]**
   - **Evidence:** [supporting data]
   - **Impact:** [what it achieved]
   - **Recommendation:** Continue this approach

2. **[Factor 2]**
   - **Evidence:** [supporting data]
   - **Impact:** [what it achieved]
   - **Recommendation:** Continue this approach

#### Improvement Opportunities
1. **[Opportunity 1]**
   - **Current State:** [description]
   - **Gap:** [what's missing]
   - **Potential:** [what could improve]
   - **Recommendation:** [specific action]

2. **[Opportunity 2]**
   - **Current State:** [description]
   - **Gap:** [what's missing]
   - **Potential:** [what could improve]
   - **Recommendation:** [specific action]

### Recommendations

#### Immediate Actions (Do Now)
1. **[Action 1]**
   - **Priority:** High
   - **Effort:** [Low/Medium/High]
   - **Impact:** [expected benefit]
   - **Steps:** [how to implement]

2. **[Action 2]**
   - **Priority:** High
   - **Effort:** [Low/Medium/High]
   - **Impact:** [expected benefit]
   - **Steps:** [how to implement]

#### Short-Term Improvements (Do Soon)
1. **[Improvement 1]**
   - **Priority:** Medium
   - **Effort:** [Low/Medium/High]
   - **Impact:** [expected benefit]
   - **Timeline:** [when to do]

#### Long-Term Enhancements (Plan For)
1. **[Enhancement 1]**
   - **Priority:** Low
   - **Effort:** [Low/Medium/High]
   - **Impact:** [expected benefit]
   - **Timeline:** [when to consider]

#### Specification Refinements
1. **[Refinement 1]**
   - **Current Spec:** [section]
   - **Issue:** [what's unclear/insufficient]
   - **Suggested Change:** [specific revision]
   - **Rationale:** [why this helps]

---

## Appendices

### Appendix A: Detailed Test Results
[Full test output summary or link]

### Appendix B: Analysis Data
[Full analysis results or link]

### Appendix C: File Inventory
[Complete list of generated files]

### Appendix D: Methodology
**Data Collection:**
- [Method 1]
- [Method 2]

**Analysis Approach:**
- [Approach 1]
- [Approach 2]

**Metrics Calculation:**
- [Calculation 1]
- [Calculation 2]

---

**Report Generated By:** Claude Code Infinite Loop Report Utility
**Report Version:** 1.0
**Contact:** [if applicable]

Usage Examples

# Generate standard report
/report outputs/ specs/example_spec.md

# Executive summary only
/report outputs/ specs/example_spec.md executive

# Detailed technical report
/report outputs/ specs/example_spec.md technical

# Summary for quick review
/report outputs/ specs/example_spec.md summary

Chain-of-Thought Benefits

This utility uses explicit reasoning to:

  • Systematically collect all relevant data dimensions
  • Make analysis methodology transparent for reproducibility
  • Provide clear reasoning chains from data to insights
  • Enable stakeholders to understand how conclusions reached
  • Support data-driven decision-making through comprehensive analysis

Execution Protocol

Now, generate the report:

  1. Define scope - purpose, audience, time period
  2. Collect data - iterations, specs, tests, analysis
  3. Analyze quantitatively - calculate all metrics
  4. Assess qualitatively - evaluate content and patterns
  5. Compare - spec compliance, historical, benchmarks
  6. Identify issues - categorize problems
  7. Generate insights - synthesize findings
  8. Format report - structure for clarity

Begin report generation for the specified outputs.