105 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
105 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
# Vision Document: Commons Stack Reboot
|
|
|
|
## The Problem
|
|
|
|
The commons movement faces several interconnected challenges:
|
|
|
|
1. **Sustainability Crisis**: Commons infrastructure (like the P2P Foundation Wiki) lacks sustainable funding
|
|
2. **Knowledge Fragmentation**: Decades of accumulated wisdom risk being lost or scattered
|
|
3. **Tooling Gap**: Existing tools don't adequately serve commons-based organizations
|
|
4. **Coordination Failure**: Commons initiatives struggle to coordinate at scale
|
|
5. **Legacy Preservation**: Key figures' life work needs active stewardship
|
|
|
|
## The Opportunity
|
|
|
|
Michel Bauwens' passing marks both an ending and a beginning. The P2P/Commons movement has matured enough to:
|
|
|
|
- Take collective responsibility for shared infrastructure
|
|
- Build on decades of theoretical and practical groundwork
|
|
- Leverage new technologies (Web3, federated systems, AI) for the commons
|
|
- Create regenerative funding mechanisms that embody commons principles
|
|
|
|
## Core Principles
|
|
|
|
### 1. Subsidiarity
|
|
Decisions made at the most local level possible. Global coordination only where necessary.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Cosmo-Localism
|
|
"Design global, manufacture local" — shared knowledge commons with localized production.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Contributive Justice
|
|
Recognition and reward for all forms of contribution, not just financial.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Generative Ownership
|
|
Ownership structures that generate benefits for all stakeholders, not extract from them.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Open Protocols
|
|
Interoperable, forkable, and composable systems that prevent lock-in.
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Pillars
|
|
|
|
### Pillar 1: Preserve
|
|
- Archive and index Michel Bauwens' writings, talks, and interviews
|
|
- Ensure P2P Foundation Wiki remains accessible and maintained
|
|
- Document oral histories from movement elders
|
|
- Create redundant, distributed backups
|
|
|
|
### Pillar 2: Sustain
|
|
- Develop funding mechanisms for commons infrastructure
|
|
- Build contributor support systems
|
|
- Create governance that prevents burnout and extraction
|
|
- Establish mutual aid networks among commons projects
|
|
|
|
### Pillar 3: Evolve
|
|
- Update theoretical frameworks for current conditions
|
|
- Develop new tools serving commons needs
|
|
- Experiment with emerging technologies
|
|
- Bridge Web3 and traditional commons movements
|
|
|
|
### Pillar 4: Propagate
|
|
- Educational resources and curricula
|
|
- Onboarding pathways for newcomers
|
|
- Translation and localization
|
|
- Story-telling and narrative work
|
|
|
|
## Success Metrics
|
|
|
|
- P2P Foundation Wiki uptime and contribution rate
|
|
- Diversity of funding sources
|
|
- Number of active contributors
|
|
- Cross-project collaboration instances
|
|
- Knowledge resources created/preserved
|
|
- Communities served
|
|
|
|
## Timeline Horizons
|
|
|
|
### Near-term (6 months)
|
|
- Establish core contributor circle
|
|
- Secure initial funding for wiki hosting
|
|
- Create governance framework
|
|
- Launch ideation process
|
|
|
|
### Medium-term (1-2 years)
|
|
- Implement sustainable funding mechanism
|
|
- Develop commons tooling prototypes
|
|
- Build federation with aligned projects
|
|
- Expand contributor base
|
|
|
|
### Long-term (3-5 years)
|
|
- Self-sustaining commons infrastructure
|
|
- Thriving ecosystem of interoperable tools
|
|
- Global network of local commons hubs
|
|
- Living knowledge commons continuously updated
|
|
|
|
## Open Questions
|
|
|
|
1. What is the relationship between this initiative and existing Commons Stack entities?
|
|
2. How do we balance preservation with evolution?
|
|
3. What funding mechanisms best align with our values?
|
|
4. How do we prevent capture by any single interest?
|
|
5. What role should token-based systems play, if any?
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
*This is a living document. Please contribute your thoughts via pull requests or issues.*
|