diff --git a/concepts/crypto-exchange.md b/concepts/crypto-exchange.md index f7ff066..b0e031e 100644 --- a/concepts/crypto-exchange.md +++ b/concepts/crypto-exchange.md @@ -14,4 +14,15 @@ Crypto exchanges are commonly set up in jurisdictions with loose or corrupt fina * Seychelles * The Bahamas * Cayman Islands -* Singapore \ No newline at end of file +* Singapore + +## References + +* Ivaniuk, Viktoria. 2020. ‘Cryptocurrency Exchange Regulation – An International Review’. Magda Dziembowska, Robert Dziembowski, Apelacja w Postępowaniu, 67. +* White, Molly. 2022. ‘Cryptocurrency Off-Ramps, and the Shift towards Centralization’. Molly White. 12 February 2022. https://blog.mollywhite.net/off-ramps/. +* Cumming, Douglas J., Sofia Johan, and Anshum Pant. 2019. ‘Regulation of the Crypto-Economy: Managing Risks, Challenges, and Regulatory Uncertainty’. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12 (3): 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030126. +* Canning, Tonya. 2018. ‘"We Don’t Want Hippy Money”: Contradiction and Exchange in a Local Currency System’. PhD Thesis. https://dalspace.library.dal.ca/handle/10222/74190. +* Johnson, Kristin N. 2021. ‘Decentralized Finance: Regulating Cryptocurrency Exchanges’. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3831439. +* Lefevre, Edwin. 2004. Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. Vol. 175. John Wiley & Sons. +* Mizrach, Bruce. 2021. ‘Stablecoins: Survivorship, Transactions Costs and Exchange Microstructure’. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3835219. +* Roubini, Nouriel. 2019. ‘The Great Crypto Heist’. Project Syndicate 16. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/cryptocurrency-exchanges-are-financial-scams-by-nouriel-roubini-2019-07. diff --git a/concepts/dao.md b/concepts/dao.md index 00cb515..fae76c6 100644 --- a/concepts/dao.md +++ b/concepts/dao.md @@ -12,6 +12,33 @@ DAOs are best understood as shares in a common enterprise which is run by potent * Constitution DAO * Spice DAO +## References + +* Bayern, Shawn. 2021. Autonomous Organizations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878203. +* Brennecke, Martin, Benjamin Schellinger, Nils Urbach, and Tobias Guggenberger. 2022. ‘The De-Central Bank in Decentralized Finance: A Case Study of MakerDAO’. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.737. +* Chen, Liang, Tony W. Tong, Shaoqin Tang, and Nianchen Han. 2022. ‘Governance and Design of Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Research Directions on a Meta-Organization’. Journal of Management 48 (1): 147–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211045023. +* Crepaldi, M. 2020. ‘The Authority of Distributed Consensus Systems Trust, Governance, and Normative Perspectives on Blockchains and Distributed Ledgers’. PhD Thesis. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/9432/. +* El Faqir, Youssef, Javier Arroyo, and Samer Hassan. 2020. ‘An Overview of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations on the Blockchain’. PervasiveHealth: Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, August. https://doi.org/10.1145/3412569.3412579. +* Faqir-Rhazoui, Youssef, Javier Arroyo, and Samer Hassan. 2021. ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Platforms for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations in the Ethereum Blockchain’. Journal of Internet Services and Applications 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-021-00139-6. +* Frey, Seth, P. M. Krafft, and Brian C. Keegan. 2019. ‘“This Place Does What It Was Built for”: Designing Digital Institutions for Participatory Change’. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 (CSCW): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359134. +* Hassan, Samer, and Primavera De Filippi. 2021. ‘Decentralized Autonomous Organization’. Internet Policy Review 10 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1556. +* Hsieh, Ying Ying, Jean Philippe Vergne, Philip Anderson, Karim Lakhani, and Markus Reitzig. 2018. ‘Bitcoin and the Rise of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations’. Journal of Organization Design 7 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-018-0038-1. +* Lovett, Matthew, and Lee Thomas. 2021. ‘A Fork in the Road: Perspectives on Sustainability and Decentralised Governance in Digital Institutions’. First Monday 26 (11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i11.12357. +* Lumineau, Fabrice, Wenqian Wang, and Oliver Schilke. 2021. ‘Blockchain Governance-A New Way of Organizing Collaborations?’ Organization Science 32 (2): 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1379. +* Lustig, Caitlin. 2019. ‘Intersecting Imaginaries: Visions of Decentralized Autonomous Systems’. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3 (CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359312. +* Morrison, Robbie, Natasha C. H. L. Mazey, and Stephen C. Wingreen. 2020. ‘The DAO Controversy: The Case for a New Species of Corporate Governance?’ Frontiers in Blockchain 3 (May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.00025. +* Murray, Alex, Jen Rhymer, and David G. Sirmon. 2021. ‘Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations’. Academy of Management Review 46 (3): 552–71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0186. +* Poblet, Marta, Darcy W. E. Allen, Oleksii Konashevych, Aaron M. Lane, and Carlos Andres Diaz Valdivia. 2020. ‘From Athens to the Blockchain: Oracles for Digital Democracy’. Frontiers in Blockchain 3: 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2020.575662. +* Rikken, Olivier, Marijn Janssen, and Zenlin Kwee. n.d. ‘The Ins and Outs of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (Daos)’. Available at SSRN 3989559. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3989559. +* Schirrmacher, Nina-Birte, Johannes Rude Jensen, and Michel Avital. 2021. ‘Token-Centric Work Practices in Fluid Organizations: The Cases of Yearn and MakerDAO’. In The 42nd International Conference on Information Systems: ICIS 2021: Building Sustainability and Resilience With Is: A Call for Action. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2021/is_future_work/is_future_work/17/. +* Schneider, Nathan. 2021. ‘Broad-Based Stakeholder Ownership in Journalism: Co-Ops, ESOPs, Blockchains’. Media Industries Journal 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.3998/mij.15031809.0007.203. +* Sun, Xiaotong. 2021. ‘Centralized Governance in Decentralized Finance (DeFi): A Case Study of MakerDAO’. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3971791. +* Tse, Nathan. 2020. ‘Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Corporate Form’. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 51 (2): 313. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v51i2.6573. +* Vergne, JP. 2020. ‘Decentralized vs. Distributed Organization: Blockchain, Machine Learning and the Future of the Digital Platform’. Organization Theory 1 (4): 263178772097705. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720977052. +* Wissel, Tim. 2021. ‘Fairness and Freedom for Artists: Towards a Robot Economy for the Music Industry’. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:72a5c834-177b-4b3c-a6f8-8e69e65cfdf4. +* Wright, Steven A. 2021. ‘Measuring DAO Autonomy: Lessons From Other Autonomous Systems’. IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society 2 (1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/tts.2021.3054974. + + ## References * [@morrison_dao_2020] diff --git a/site/pages/about.md b/site/pages/about.md index 5c634a3..4080036 100644 --- a/site/pages/about.md +++ b/site/pages/about.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ We will be steel-manning the key claims made by proponents of web3 through consc ### Big, controversial and making sense is hard -**Web3 & crypto has become a massive phenomenon** with very big claims made about its actual and potential impact. Claims that go far beyond traditional technology boosterism (better, faster) to claims for radical transformation (and improvement) of our economic and social systems – for example, web3 is revolutionary for X where X is everything from money and the economy to governance to funding [public goods](../../concepts/public-goods-problem.md) like (open) software, carbon removal etc. +**Web3 & crypto has become a massive phenomenon** with very big claims made about its actual and potential impact. Claims that go far beyond traditional technology boosterism (better, faster) to claims for radical transformation (and improvement) of our economic and social systems – for example, web3 is revolutionary for X where X is everything from [money](../../concepts/money.md) and the economy to governance to funding [public goods](../../concepts/public-goods-problem.md) like (open) software, carbon removal etc. **Controversial and polarizing**: At the same time, there is an exceptional level of disagreement about these claims, even on basic points or definitions. The topic is highly controversial and even polarizing, with strong pro and anti camps. For example, within tech it is one of the most controversial topics we have ever seen and, significantly, disagreement cuts across classic ideological lines -- there are pro/anti [libertarian](../../concepts/ideologies/libertarianism.md) as well as pro/anti [socialists](../../concepts/ideologies/marxism.md).