From 9cf8d9e28ad43e7b642bf011ca1bae0aeb40fa69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: theo-cox <72795023+theo-cox@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:53:10 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update can-solve-public-goods-problem.md

[s]: typo fix
---
 claims/can-solve-public-goods-problem.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/claims/can-solve-public-goods-problem.md b/claims/can-solve-public-goods-problem.md
index 3e65676..d7b989a 100644
--- a/claims/can-solve-public-goods-problem.md
+++ b/claims/can-solve-public-goods-problem.md
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Wiblin, Robert, and Vitalik Buterin. ‘Vitalik Buterin on Better Ways to Fund P
 > So quadratic funding is basically trying to make a sort of more market-like alternative that encourages the production of public goods that basically says like, we’re going to be neutral, we’re not going to have our own kind of specific opinion about what is a real public good and what isn’t. We’re just going to say, people can donate money and stuff. And if a lot of people are donating money to the same thing, then that’s clearly a project that benefits a lot of people. So that’s a public good. And so we’re going to detect that and we’re going to automatically subsidize it based on a formula.
 
 
-# Full Ananlysis
+# Full Analysis
 
 
 ## Sub-claims: