jeffemmett
/
web3
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

create claims/opportunity-for-gain

This commit is contained in:
EilidhRoss1 2022-09-15 16:01:24 +01:00
parent 04fdbd7dfc
commit 071e13985a
1 changed files with 101 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

101
claims/opportunity-for-gain.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
---
title: Unregulated crypto markets are desirable because of the opportunity for gain
description: Evaluating the thesis that there is money to be made in unregulated crypto markets, and therefore unregulated crypto markets are desirable. We find the negative externalities of an unregulated crypto market to outweigh the benefits, thus this claim fails: an unregulated crypto market is *not* desirable.
category:
- claim: y
- featured: y
- interview: n
- deepdive: n
claim:
- evaluation: NN
- confidence: HH
---
# Summary
## Claim Steel-Manned
#### Retail traders (individual, non-professional market participants)
* Investing in crypto has the possibility of gaining me huge assymetric returns.
* I've heard other people making huge gains by investing in crypto, therefore it is possible that I can make huge gains aswell.
#### Quants and hedge funds
* If I'm allowed to trade products that are massively [asymmetric](../concepts/asymmetric-information.md) and disadvantageous to retail traders, then I can and I will. Markets are a force akin to evolution: inefficient players will be elimated, and the strongest will be rewarded.
* There is no non-public disclosure about the risks of these assets. Everyone is going in with their eyes open that this is the wild west.
* Even if I know it’s a [greater fool asset](../concepts/greater-fool-theory) and has no [fundamental value](/concepts/fundamental-value.md), if I have access to non-public information and more capital I can (and should) use it and exit before the other fools.
* If the market allows [market manipulation](../concepts/market-manipulation.md) ([pump and dumps](../concepts/pump-and-dump.md), insider trading, [wash trading](../concepts/wash-trading.md)) this is public knowledge and it is reflected in the price formation of the assets.
* Some people legitimately did make money trading on [bubbles](../concepts/bubble.md): South Sea Bubble, Dotcom Bubble, Tulip Mania. These booms and busts are just a natural part of market cycles.
## Evidence of claim being made
Retail trader interviewd by the FT in [Barrett, Claer. ‘Why Young Investors Bet the Farm on Cryptocurrencies’. Financial Times, 2021:](https:www.ft.com/content/162839aa-0437-478b-a4d4-4a8d7ab71458)
> Sam found out his younger brother had turned a £3,000 investment into £30,000 within four years — money he now intends to use as a property deposit. "I was very surprised and it made me feel a bit stupid . . . why aren’t I doing this?... I'll either be rich or wrong".
Mann Group chief in [Silverman, Gary. ‘Crypto Has “No Inherent Worth” but Is Good to Trade, Says Man Group Chief’. Financial Times, 2021:](https://www.ft.com/content/9275baf4-0422-43a1-b8c9-9317882ca874)
> If you look at cryptocurrencies as a whole, it is a pure trading instrument. There is no inherent worth in it whatsoever. It is a tulip bulb.
[Huang, Matt. ‘Bitcoin for the Open-Minded Skeptic’. Matt Huang, May 2020:](https://www.matthuang.com/posts/bitcoin_for_the_open_minded_skeptic.)
> Bitcoin offers a compelling risk/reward profile for patient, long-term investors willing to spend the time to truly understand Bitcoin.
[HQ, Ikigai. ‘The Case for a Small Allocation to Bitcoin’. Kana and Katana, 1 March 2019:](https://www.kanaandkatana.com/valuation-depot-contents/2019/4/11/the-case-for-a-small-allocation-to-bitcoin)
> Bitcoin offers a unique opportunity for a non-material exposure to produce a material outcome. It would be irresponsible to have an exposure to Bitcoin that one cannot afford to lose because the risk of losing the principal is very real. But it would be almost as irresponsible to not have any exposure at all.
## Evaluation: False (High confidence)
#### Risk to individuals
While some people have made gains trading crypto, there is a strong sample bias in self-reported winnings of crypto assets: participants who make outsized returns [gambling](../claims/is-gambling.md) on the [bubble](../concepts/bubble.md) are more likely to report these returns compared to the vast majority of those who lose money investing in crypto assets.
And in such an [asymetric](../concepts/asymmetric-information.md) and "wild west" market, the chances of a minow beating out the sharks is tiny.
Everything that has been illegal for 80 years is suddenly allowed: [wash trading](../concepts/wash-trading.md); [front running](../concepts/front-running.md); [insider trading](../concepts/asymmetric-information.md); price manipulation and [order book](../concepts/order-book.md) tampering;[refusing cash withdrawels](../concepts/counterparty-risk.md); [pump and dumps](../concepts/pump-and-dump). Exchanges are basically like bucket shops from the 1920s.
What we are seeing is a captive market for fictitious commodities that is controlled by opaque unregulated market making and an economic cartel. This is great if you're inside the cartel, but not so great if you aren’t. Wealth transfer from the public to insiders is all but guaranteed by the [information asymmetry](../concepts/asymmetric-information).
#### Wider risk
We have no idea how much [leverage](../concepts/leverage.md) is baked into the entire market, induced by products like unbaked [stablecoins](../concepts/stablecoin.md) which can seemingly produce limitless amounts of unsecured debt products on demand.
In her 2022 paper ‘DeFi: Shadow Banking 2.0?’ Prof. Hilary Allen warns that the current [decentralized finance](../concepts/defi.md) system risks emulating the “shadow banking” services (functional equivalents for banking products which operate outside the regulated banking sphere) which contributed to the 2008 banking crisis:
“if DeFi is permitted to develop without any regulatory intervention, it will magnify the tendencies towards heightened leverage, rigidity, and runs that characterized Shadow Banking 1.0.”
Commentators have raised concerns about stablecoins in particular, describing them as analogous to the money market funds (MMF) at the heart of the 2008 crisis in their potential to cause runs. Prof. Allen explains:
“If something were to shake confidence in stablecoins’ acceptance in the DeFi ecosystem (this ‘something’ could range from a hack, to a problem with the reserve of assets backing a stablecoin, to a problem with the smart contracts managing the value of a decentralized stablecoin), we could then expect holders to exchange their stablecoins for fiat currency and exchanges to seek redemption, forcing stablecoin issuers to start liquidating the reserve of assets backing the stablecoin, depressing the market value of those assets, and cutting off credit for the corporations in which MMFs usually invest through the commercial paper market.”
This fragility and extreme vulnerability pervades the entire crypto-economy. The core mechanism – of minting tokens with no use value and who’s market price is artificially driven by speculative hype – underpins almost the whole system. What might appear as a recipe for [perpetual growth](../notes/financial-perpetual-motion-machine.md) and financial gain in fact appears highly likely to have created a speculation fuelled [bubble](../concepts/bubble.md).
Where does all this lead to?
* If the crypto marklet is left unregulated, [systemic risk](..claims/is-systemic-risk.md)
* Inequality (money flows to the sharks)
* Distrust and cynicism in
* society: I’m out for myself, other people are just out for themselves. Dishonesty and exploitation are a normal part of (capitalist) society.
* markets: assuming that markets have some value then undermining faith in them is problematic.
* the state and its institutions:When it goes wrong the state and its institutions and leaders are blamed, further corroding trust in our collective capabilities.
* [Moral hazard](../concepts/moral-hazard.md) - public is incentivized to take on disproportionate risk expecting a bailout.
* A terribly pathological form of [capitalism](../concepts/capitalism.md) that doesn't result in price formation on collective enterprise, goods or services.
## References
Akerlof, G.A. (1978) ‘The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism’, in _Uncertainty in economics_. Elsevier, pp. 235–251.
Allen, H.J. (2022) ‘DeFi: Shadow Banking 2.0?’, _SSRN Electronic Journal_ [Preprint]. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4038788](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4038788).
Burilov, V. (2019) ‘Regulation of Crypto Tokens and Initial Coin Offerings in the EU: De lege lata and de lege ferenda’, _European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance_, 6(2), pp. 146–186. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00602003](https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00602003).
Cumming, D.J., Johan, S. and Pant, A. (2019) ‘Regulation of the Crypto-Economy: Managing Risks, Challenges, and Regulatory Uncertainty’, _Journal of Risk and Financial Management_, 12(3), p. 126. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030126](https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030126).
Dhawan, A. and Putnins, T.J. (2020) ‘A New Wolf in Town? Pump-and-Dump Manipulation in Cryptocurrency Markets’, _SSRN Electronic Journal_ [Preprint]. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3670714](https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3670714).
Ferrari, V. (2020) ‘The regulation of crypto-assets in the EU – investment and payment tokens under the radar’, _Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law_, 27(3), pp. 325–342. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20911538](https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20911538).
HQ, I. (2019) _The case for a small allocation to Bitcoin_, _Kana and Katana_. Available at: [https://www.kanaandkatana.com/valuation-depot-contents/2019/4/11/the-case-for-a-small-allocation-to-bitcoin](https://www.kanaandkatana.com/valuation-depot-contents/2019/4/11/the-case-for-a-small-allocation-to-bitcoin) (Accessed: 14 September 2022).
Huang, M. (2020) _Bitcoin for the Open-Minded Skeptic_, _Matt Huang_. Available at: [https://www.matthuang.com/posts/bitcoin_for_the_open_minded_skeptic](https://www.matthuang.com/posts/bitcoin_for_the_open_minded_skeptic) (Accessed: 14 September 2022).
Lefevre, E. (2004) _Reminiscences of a stock operator_. John Wiley & Sons.