remove some notes for now
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd9d56cf4e
commit
0faf56eed9
|
|
@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
|
|||
|
||||
- Why do we have 10 different apps for messaging the same friends?
|
||||
- App silos create terrible UX for users, blocking the free flow of information from one digital identity to another
|
||||
- App silos are a result of capitalist business models
|
||||
- We can break down those app silos, but only if we are willing to think outside of the paradigm of capitalist business models
|
||||
|
||||
Introducing Project Interlay
|
||||
- Internal BlockScience research project pushing forward open core R&D into canvas primitives
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
Why is Interlay important:
|
||||
- Interconnectivity - future of internet
|
||||
- Open source, rethinking collective computation
|
||||
- Information, workflow, governance, funding integrations
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
Orion demos:
|
||||
- Canvas browser: https://x.com/OrionReedOne/status/1805602416659673116
|
||||
- Layout constraints: https://x.com/OrionReedOne/status/1805300928293085201
|
||||
- Desktop: https://x.com/OrionReedOne/status/1793937287039910202
|
||||
- Primitive composition: https://x.com/OrionReedOne/status/1792812569935188431
|
||||
- Nested abstractions: https://x.com/OrionReedOne/status/1790263523857019227
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
|||
- Perp swaps as derivatives (e.g. options, futures, leverage) with no expiry
|
||||
- https://medium.com/derivadex/what-are-perpetual-swaps-130236587df2
|
||||
- Dopex: decentralized options exchange: https://www.dopex.io/
|
||||
- Opyn squeeth (eth^2 leverage): https://www.opyn.co/squeeth?ct=CA
|
||||
- Panoptic, no expiry, oracle free options: https://twitter.com/Panoptic_xyz
|
||||
- While Panoptic allows you to hedge against Uniswap LP positions by shorting them, it also allows you to create puts, calls, straddles, jade lizards, zebra spreads, and [many other custom option payoffs](https://twitter.com/Panoptic_xyz/status/1628530117118169088?s=20)!
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
|||
I'm here because I believe our political systems are fundamentally and systemically flawed.
|
||||
|
||||
I would say our legacy political systems have atrophied, but they were never very good at upgrading themselves to begin with - and that's our biggest problem right there.
|
||||
|
||||
A riding used to be how far your representative could ride in a day. These systems were developed back when the states was x million people, communication by mail took weeks, and bloodletting was an accepted medical practice.
|
||||
|
||||
This system has incredible technical debt. The pencil and paper. The attachments of our current political system hold us back from innovating how we need to. Our social signals
|
||||
|
||||
Most people are getting ignored no matter who gets in office, petitions are bullshit, shouting into the void. If only we could SIGNAL our preferences somewhere.
|
||||
|
||||
Problem of peak hierarchy. I watch Justin Trudeau get on screen every day and try to solve all the problems of Canada. He don't know shit. He gets told things by a couple experts. Why don't we include more experts? How about stakeholders too? Isn't that how we should be making decisions as a collective anyway?
|
||||
|
||||
Now before you say "everyone voting on everything would be impossible", let me assure you that is not the plan. But what we can do is organize effectively at the community level and empower those communities to solve more of their own problems. Those communities can collaborate at higher levels, with continuous signal processing routing through and between communities.
|
||||
|
||||
Now, attachment to these patterns leads to gerrymandering, corporate lobbying, bias for financial system built into our economics, political gaming (eg social media/truth manipulation, shock doctrine, recency effect in campaigning) and popularity contests and all other sorts of systemic manipulations able to be made by powered interests
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
“The real problem of humanity is the following: we have Paleolithic emotions; medieval institutions; and god-like technology.” — E.O. Wilson
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Money is the most important coordination mechanism for society and our existing fiat system is driving our species off a cliff. Instead of arguing red vs blue, it’s time we address the root cause of our societal malaise. It’s time to unfuck the money.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.” — Mayer Amschel Rothschild
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
|
|||
Psilocybernetics can be considered the institutional/organizational neuroplasticity that MycoFi offers
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Psilocybernetics and the politics of MycoFi
|
||||
|
||||
4 goods flows as metabolism
|
||||
|
||||
Myco-mmunities
|
||||
|
||||
BSci as Cyb-org
|
||||
|
||||
Z's iterative technology diagram with star at end
|
||||
|
||||
Degrowth and organizational decline with senescence
|
||||
|
||||
Endosymbiotic finance:
|
||||
Exogenous Industrial vs infernal mitochondrial power systems
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Interpoeisis instead of autopoesis
|
||||
Relational
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Improving institutional neuroplasticity
|
||||
|
||||
Mycrozines - pump your propaganda
|
||||
|
||||
Zine A5 or a6 paper
|
||||
|
||||
Fractal artwork YouTube video 3d fractals
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Increasing Information pathways for better sense, decide and respond within an org
|
||||
|
||||
Multi track governance
|
||||
8 different dashboards
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
What is the edge length of a hexagon of 1m²?
|
||||
0.62m
|
||||
|
||||
Dashboard.holons.io/admin/map
|
||||
|
||||
Laurence - Atlas
|
||||
Cyberphalian as post-Westphalian
|
||||
|
||||
A white paper is nothing but a bunch of memes stacked up in a trenchcoat
|
||||
- Jeff to Russ in Brussels
|
||||
- WAITING as the only time you are truly FREE, outside of the system - Pekko
|
||||
- Sit & Spin laundromat with smoking section
|
||||
- Catherine dating a smoking section
|
||||
- boardgame cafe laundromat
|
||||
- with mini games like stack your cell phone and charge for use (pigou tax for attn)
|
||||
|
||||
- bam as radio ballet
|
||||
|
||||
- Russ: "this is rockin my noodle right now!"
|
||||
- Orion: our computing system today is equivalent to scribal society. Instead of church, you have the mantra of silicon valley. Praise the high devs
|
||||
- canvas as the SPACE BETWEEN everything else
|
||||
- intra systemic is systems of systems
|
||||
- canvas as intersystemic - among, between
|
||||
- post history - returning to oral history as the only thing we can trust in a coming era of informational overload and probable alternative histories
|
||||
- Urania - fotis
|
||||
- "A" collection of apocalypses... You know how to talk dirty to me" - ome to Pekko
|
||||
- Pekko - with yeast like candida albicans, the human is the soil. There are possibly entire candida fungal networks throughout your body
|
||||
- yeast are just modular, single celled fungi - phylum aggregate
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
|
|||
- Cerulean ecosystem fund, largest REGEN holder
|
||||
- Tokenomics ~~DAO~~ Working Group
|
||||
- Reason for DAO vs engineered design
|
||||
- Decentralized process recommendation by Sam Hart
|
||||
- Regulatory concerns: Wells notices are showing up, but if DAO then less liability
|
||||
- Sam Hart
|
||||
- Ecosystem lens
|
||||
- Decentralized process as much as possible
|
||||
- Two phases
|
||||
- Phase 1: interesting stuff out the door
|
||||
- Phase 2: larger scope modeling & neater stuff to upgrade
|
||||
- Regulatory concerns
|
||||
- Legal counsel recommended non-direct action on the design by Regen Foundation
|
||||
- Stakeholder groups:
|
||||
- Sam Hart
|
||||
- Sacha from
|
||||
- Validators
|
||||
- Scientist/eco folks
|
||||
- Community staking DAO
|
||||
- Where is the discussion?
|
||||
- Discourse on Regen Network CommonWealth
|
||||
- Three facets of token design
|
||||
- Utility Economics (fee splitting, etc)
|
||||
- Financialization (Defi modules)
|
||||
- Monetary economics ()
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Where could BSci be most helpful?
|
||||
- Formalizing processes around community exploration of governance of Regen monetary system
|
||||
- Group for progressive decentralization of ideation around token design
|
||||
- Community convening process
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Role of
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
- A few notes from our call with Regen on Friday:
|
||||
- Long story short, Regen is in need of some updates to their token ecosystem. Some of their updates are minor, low-cost & near-term, and some are more in-depth & long-term.
|
||||
- With an eye to regulatory action lately, they want to be particularly careful with any token ecosystem updates that appear overly "centralized", such as direct actions by Regen Foundation/Network in suggesting and implementing those updates.
|
||||
- This is the main reason they have been talking about a "Tokenomics Working Group" (much better than the DAO idea mentioned earlier) to discuss and make these kinds of decisions along with key stakeholder inclusion, as well as community input & feedback.
|
||||
- Thus far, "emergent" input on the community forum has gotten an F grade by Greg Landua, but private stakeholder conversations (e.g. with Sam Hart or Sacha) are fruitful for ideas, though none of those stakeholders have the cycles to "run" the working group
|
||||
- The Regen team has a list of near term updates in mind already, but it seems they need this working group on order to discuss, feed back on, prioritize, and vote to execute on those ideas without assuming undue liability
|
||||
- Regen's near term needs:
|
||||
- 45-90 days to show progress on low-hanging fruit initiatives
|
||||
- Requires: Mapping & operationalizing Tokenomics Working Group
|
||||
- Requires: Gathering, organizing, & stack ranking current proposals in terms of cost & temporal feasibility
|
||||
- Requires: establishing discussion forum, proposal process, & decision making tools for tokenomics WG
|
||||
- Longer term needs
|
||||
- More thorough modeling and design work
|
||||
- Higher budget availability is likely if early results were promising
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Phase 1: $15-20k possible from Regen. If delivery...
|
||||
- Phase 2: $50k+ possible from Regen + stakeholders. If still delivering...
|
||||
- Phase 3: Up to $200k possible from wider network for longer term work
|
||||
|
||||
- Needs: operational coordinative role - Max Semenchuk?
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue