48 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
48 lines
2.9 KiB
Plaintext
{{Draft|author=MBauwens|date=2026-02-02}}
|
|
'''Islands of Coherence''' is a concept introduced by [[Ilya Prigogine]] that describes pockets of order that emerge within chaotic environments in [[complex systems]].
|
|
|
|
== Description ==
|
|
|
|
According to Richard Hames:
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
"The concept of 'islands of coherence,' introduced by Ilya Prigogine, provides an additional perspective for interpreting global governance in a multipolar world. In complex systems, these islands represent pockets of order that emerge within chaotic environments. Applying this idea to global governance suggests that even amid global uncertainties, localised regions or 'village-like' networks can achieve high levels of internal stability and coherence."
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
== Application to Global Governance ==
|
|
|
|
These regions, much like the [[African Union]] or [[Mercosur]], function effectively within their broader contexts, showcasing how decentralised governance can foster resilience and adaptability. These islands of coherence exemplify how stability can emerge organically in a complex world, offering a blueprint for governance that is both resilient and adaptable.
|
|
|
|
=== Catalysts for Innovation ===
|
|
|
|
Islands of coherence can serve as catalysts for innovation and cooperation, acting as hubs where new ideas and solutions are developed and tested. As centres of order, they have the potential to influence and inspire surrounding areas, promoting systemic resilience.
|
|
|
|
This dynamic mirrors the historical [[mandala system]] of Southeast Asia, where decentralised authority and overlapping spheres of influence allowed for flexibility and responsiveness to local needs. By fostering these islands, a networked world order can emerge, characterised by discrete cultural groupings collaborating with mutual respect rather than attempting to dominate each other.
|
|
|
|
=== Embracing Pluralism ===
|
|
|
|
Incorporating Prigogine's concept into global governance highlights the importance of embracing pluralism and diversity. These islands can act as building blocks for a cohesive, coherent, yet diverse international world-system, encouraging a multitude of perspectives and approaches to coexist. This diversity enhances the model's overall strength, preventing rigidity and promoting creative problem-solving.
|
|
|
|
Richard Hames writes:
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
"By connecting and aligning these islands of coherence, we can envision a more stable, resilient, and equitable global order that is responsive to the complexities of the 21st century. In doing so, we pave the way for a world where cooperation and diversity are the cornerstones of global stability."
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
== Source ==
|
|
|
|
* [https://richarddavidhames.substack.com/p/global-governance-20 Global Governance 2.0] - Richard Hames
|
|
|
|
== See Also ==
|
|
|
|
* [[Ilya Prigogine]]
|
|
* [[Complex Systems]]
|
|
* [[Decentralized Governance]]
|
|
* [[Global Governance]]
|
|
* [[Polycentricity]]
|
|
|
|
[[Category:Complex Systems Theory]]
|
|
[[Category:Global Governance]]
|
|
[[Category:Decentralization]]
|
|
[[Category:Political Theory]]
|